Re: starting postmaster

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: ashley <ashley(at)SITCAS(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: starting postmaster
Date: 2001-01-15 06:09:23
Message-ID: 21401.979538963@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

ashley <ashley(at)SITCAS(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> postmaster appears aas a symbolic link that dosen't work

Why not? It's important to have a working postmaster link,
so you can't just blow this off.

> then tried
> nohup postgres -D /user/local/pgsql/data </dev/null >>server.log 2>>1 &
> postgres does not know where to find the database system data.

You can't just substitute postgres for postmaster --- yes, they're the
same executable, but the behavior is different depending on which name
you invoke it by. You do need a working postmaster link.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Davis 2001-01-15 06:33:08 Alternate Location
Previous Message Francisco Reyes 2001-01-15 04:49:47 Where docs on transactions?