Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com
Cc: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Antje(dot)Stejskal(at)ppi(dot)de, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?
Date: 2004-11-30 16:38:36
Message-ID: 21155.1101832716@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> Kris Jurka wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>> Since timestamp without timezone is a postgresql extension
>>
>> This is not true.
>>
> Well, one of them must be an extension so it is timestampz ?

timestamp with and without timezone are both required by the SQL
standard. If JDBC only supports one of them I'd think the JDBC
spec is a tad broken.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Xavier Poinsard 2004-11-30 16:56:35 Re: Need a performance tip - Statement pooling for server
Previous Message VIDAL Cedric 2004-11-30 15:51:42 Re: Need a performance tip - Statement pooling for server