| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |
| Date: | 2004-03-09 05:42:04 |
| Message-ID: | 21011.1078810924@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> LOCK TABLE table NO WAIT is OK for 7.5? If ok, I will make patches
> against current with some docs changes.
Dept of minor gripes: can we do this without turning "NO" into a
keyword? Even as a nonreserved word, I think that would be annoying.
"no" is a common abbreviation for "number" so I think it's likely to
get used as a column name.
If Oracle spells it "NOWAIT" then I'd be much happier with that...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2004-03-09 05:47:07 | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-09 05:16:00 | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2004-03-09 05:47:07 | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-09 05:16:00 | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |