Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes

From: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>
To: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes
Date: 2007-03-22 07:15:09
Message-ID: 20E3BADE-1349-425D-947B-E5998373A9BE@pointblue.com.pl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


On Mar 22, 2007, at 7:25 AM, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
>
>
> Grzegorz, if you can try HOT as well, that will be great.
>

I tried, and it worked very well with 4.2 v of patch, as I remember.
My point was, since 'the day' comes closer, and you guys work on
close areas inside pg - I would like to be able to safely run both
patches.
I will give both a go, once I get some free time here.

--
Grzegorz Jaskiewicz

starving C/C++ freelance for hire

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-03-22 07:48:18 Re: "Relation not found" error but table exits.
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 2007-03-22 07:11:11 Re: relation 71478240 deleted while still in use on 8.1

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2007-03-22 13:23:54 Re: [PATCHES] As proposed the complete changes to pg_trigger and pg_rewrite
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2007-03-22 06:25:15 Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes