Re: BUG #16040: PL/PGSQL RETURN QUERY statement never uses a parallel plan

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hamid Akhtar <hamid(dot)akhtar(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16040: PL/PGSQL RETURN QUERY statement never uses a parallel plan
Date: 2020-03-27 19:27:01
Message-ID: 20975.1585337221@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Hamid Akhtar <hamid(dot)akhtar(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world: tested, passed
> Implements feature: tested, passed
> Spec compliant: tested, passed
> Documentation: tested, passed

> All good with this patch.

Thanks for testing!

Anybody have an objection to cramming this into v13? It is a bit late,
but it seems like a performance bug fix ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2020-03-27 19:57:05 Re: BUG #16320: GSSAPI Error
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-03-27 19:15:17 Re: BUG #16320: GSSAPI Error

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-03-27 19:27:45 Re: allow online change primary_conninfo
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-03-27 19:24:33 Re: WAL usage calculation patch