| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gorm(dot)Andersen(at)Sun(dot)COM |
| Subject: | Re: compiler warnings on the buildfarm |
| Date: | 2007-07-13 13:52:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20908.1184334730@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>> I don't see any "const" keyword there.
> Right after that:
>> where int conv(int num_msg, const struct pam_message **msg, struct pam_response **resp, void *appdata_ptr);
> How confusing...
And the pam_start page he cited earlier has a different set of typos in
its version of the struct :-(. Still, that's two out of three places
that say it's const, and Solaris appears to be the only implementation
that has chosen to read it as not const.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2007-07-13 13:58:17 | Re: compiler warnings on the buildfarm |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2007-07-13 13:50:56 | has anyone looked at burstsort ? |