Re: MV patch broke users of ExplainOneQuery_hook

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MV patch broke users of ExplainOneQuery_hook
Date: 2013-04-09 15:40:48
Message-ID: 2088.1365522048@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> writes:
> Any objections to my pushing the patch I posted Friday to draw a
> distinction between populated and scannable, which also attempted
> to address a couple points raised by you, or would you rather the
> code didn't change at the moment?

I didn't look at it yet --- had my head in trigram regex stuff all
weekend. Gimme a couple hours ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-04-09 15:44:02 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add sql_drop event for event triggers
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-04-09 15:28:27 Re: MV patch broke users of ExplainOneQuery_hook