Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?
Date: 2007-03-19 03:40:35
Message-ID: 20879.1174275635@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Ok, good point. Now, which of those need to have a check for valid encoding?

The vast majority will barf on any non-ASCII character anyway ... only
the ones that don't will need a check.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-19 03:49:42 Re: modifying the tbale function
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-19 03:34:53 Re: ILIKE and indexes