| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables? |
| Date: | 2008-10-14 12:51:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20646.1223988666@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> LOG: autovacuum: found orphan temp table "pg_temp_2"."foo" in database
> "postgres"
> I remember the discussion when that was put in, but I'm starting to
> think that printing that every time autovacuum wakes up, which is once
> per minute by default, is too noisy.
What else would you do? I can't see adding state to remember when we
printed it last.
> Also, it doesn't give me any hint
> on what I can do to get rid of the message; I had to search the archives
> to find out that I can "DROP SCHEMA pg_temp_2".
We could surely add an errhint() to the message.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2008-10-14 13:07:52 | Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-14 12:47:16 | Re: There's some sort of race condition with the new FSM stuff |