Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ?
Date: 2006-08-25 16:10:52
Message-ID: 2051.1156522252@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Am Freitag, 25. August 2006 17:30 schrieb Martijn van Oosterhout:
>> Umm, why export all these functions. For starters, does this even need
>> to be in libpq?

> Where else would you put it?
> ...
> initdb has different requirements. Let me know if you have a different way to
> refactor it that satisfies initdb.

Um, but initdb doesn't use libpq, so it's going to need its own copy
anyway. I agree with Martijn that putting these into libpq's API
seems like useless clutter.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bob Pawley 2006-08-25 16:35:21 Inserting Data
Previous Message epost2 2006-08-25 16:09:09 getting on the system

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-08-25 16:16:33 [Open Item] Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2006-08-25 16:03:08 Re: Autovacuum on by default?