| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Grega Bremec <grega(dot)bremec(at)noviforum(dot)si> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Refined LC_COLLATE or multiple database clusters? |
| Date: | 2004-06-09 13:53:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20467.1086789212@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
Grega Bremec <grega(dot)bremec(at)noviforum(dot)si> writes:
> Collate order for those databases, however, needs to be different.
If you need multiple LC_COLLATE settings then you have to run multiple
postmasters. There is no other solution today, nor likely to be one in
the near future.
> Also, running several postmasters on this same machine is not an option,
Sure it is. Just don't go overboard with the shared_buffers settings.
Let the kernel do the bulk of the buffering and you'll be fine.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David F. Skoll | 2004-06-09 14:09:27 | Dump only part of a DB |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-09 13:46:41 | Re: [Fwd: Re: RHDB just sits and does nothing?] |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-09 13:56:18 | Re: Question regarding dynamic_library_path |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-09 13:36:26 | Re: thread safety tests |