Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.2 and 8.3 postgresql.conf oddity

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.2 and 8.3 postgresql.conf oddity
Date: 2008-01-23 15:22:11
Message-ID: 20455.1201101731@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> #seq_page_cost = 1.0                    # measured on an arbitrary scale
> #random_page_cost = 4                  # same scale as above
> #cpu_tuple_cost = 0.01                  # same scale as above
> #cpu_index_tuple_cost = 0.005           # same scale as above
> #cpu_operator_cost = 0.0025             # same scale as above

> The "same scale as above" while we have an "arbitrary scale" on the
> first line is a bit weird.

What do you find odd about it?  Whatever scale you choose to think these
values are in, they all have to be on the same scale.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: David GradwellDate: 2008-01-23 16:27:22
Subject: BUG #3897: plJava dll still doesn't load
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-01-23 15:21:30
Subject: Re: 8.2 and 8.3 postgresql.conf oddity

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group