Re: 8.2 and 8.3 postgresql.conf oddity

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.2 and 8.3 postgresql.conf oddity
Date: 2008-01-23 16:48:14
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10801230848lcfec341pffe63d95d4dd5e4b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Jan 23, 2008 4:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> What do you find odd about it? Whatever scale you choose to think these
> values are in, they all have to be on the same scale.

So they are not defined in relation compared to the sequential page
fetch cost as they were before? I mean, if I change seq_page_cost
only, it doesn't change the overall behaviour?

--
Guillaume

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-01-23 17:04:11 Re: 8.2 and 8.3 postgresql.conf oddity
Previous Message David Gradwell 2008-01-23 16:27:22 BUG #3897: plJava dll still doesn't load