| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Writing WAL for relcache invalidation: pg_internal.init |
| Date: | 2006-11-01 17:05:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20450.1162400725@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Enclose a patch for new WAL records for relcache invalidation.
I don't think this works. RelationCacheInitFileInvalidate is executed
post-commit, which means that there's a window between commit and where
you propose to write the WAL entry. A crash and restart in that
interval would leave the catalog changes committed, but not reflected
into pg_internal.init.
I think we're probably better off to just forcibly remove the init file
during post-recovery cleanup. The easiest place to do this might be
BuildFlatFiles, which has to scan pg_database anyway ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-01 17:20:26 | Re: Extended protocol logging |
| Previous Message | Chuck McDevitt | 2006-11-01 16:31:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Case Preservation disregarding case |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-01 17:20:26 | Re: Extended protocol logging |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-01 15:06:49 | Re: Extended protocol logging |