Re: Syntax conflicts in frame clause

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Syntax conflicts in frame clause
Date: 2009-11-24 18:02:31
Message-ID: 20210.1259085751@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Rewriting my frame support types patch to allow any expression in
> PRECEDING/FOLLOWING clause, I found the syntax below in PG conflicts:

Yeah, we ran into that in the original WINDOW patch IIRC, and found some
solution to it that got taken out again when the functionality was cut
down for 8.4. You might want to look back to see what that looked like;
I think we avoided reserving BETWEEN at the cost of making the
productions a bit more redundant.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-24 18:06:13 Re: garbage in psql -l
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-11-24 17:59:40 Re: [HACKERS] Updating column on row update