| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, ram(dot)maurya(at)lavainternational(dot)in, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #16497: old and new pg_controldata WAL segment sizes are invalid or do not match |
| Date: | 2020-06-30 15:56:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20200630155616.GB28710@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 05:26:10PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 09:48:55AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 02:29:43PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 02:11:14PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > >> I do think the doc could probably say replica 'or higher'.
> >
> > +1. Sounds good to me to just use "or higher" here. The docs insist
> > on the concept of hierarchy for values of wal_level.
>
> Instead of mentioning a specific wal_level "or higher", I decided to
> just mention the WAL level _not_ to use; patch attached.
Patch applied through 9.5.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2020-06-30 16:09:58 | BUG #16518: DBA on several PostgreSQL versions |
| Previous Message | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais | 2020-06-30 13:30:08 | [BUG][PATCH] ecpg crash with bytea type and cursors |