Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:45:47PM -0300, Arthur Nascimento wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 15:27, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > > 1. Near the top, there's a line saying "A record can have one of the seven
> > > formats", then the followup list shows 9 formats. The ones on host[no]gssenc
> > > were added to the IP-address/IP-mask section, but not to the address
> > > section. I believe the intention was to have 11 lines there, with a
> > > corresponding count at the top.
> ...
> > I agree with your suggestions. I also noticed that pg_hba.conf is
> > missing gssapi entries too, so I added them to the attached patch. too.
>
> I thought the list would jump to 11 lines there, meaning 1 local plus
> 5 on address plus 5 on IP-address/IP-mask.
> As it stands now with 9 lines, it's 1 local plus 3 on address (it's
> missing the two on host[no]gssenc) plus 5 on IP-address/IP-mask.

Ah, I see. Updated patch attached.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +