From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | brahmbhattkinjal18(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16320: GSSAPI Error |
Date: | 2020-03-27 21:08:09 |
Message-ID: | 20200327210809.GK13712@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Greetings,
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> >> Should we document somewhere that we consider that unsupported?
> >> Trying it here, I see a bunch of "deprecation" warnings during
> >> the build, but it does build --- which might lead people to expect
> >> that it'd work.
>
> > There had been discussion on another thread about trying to figure out a
> > way to detect the OSX GSSAPI library and refuse to build with GSSAPI
> > support when that's what we'd be building against. I didn't see anyone
> > post a patch though and I haven't got an OSX box to play with myself
> > easily at hand.
>
> Just poking around, it looks like something along this line would work:
>
> #ifdef GSSKRB_APPLE_DEPRECATED
> #error "Postgres doesn't work with the macOS GSSAPI library, please use XXX instead."
> #endif
>
> (in any suitable spot after #including gssapi.h)
>
> Now, this is testing the *headers* not the actual *library*, which in
> some sense is not the right thing. But it's probably close enough for
> the purpose.
Sounds good to me.
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2020-03-28 05:43:05 | BUG #16325: Assert failure on partitioning by int for a text value with a collation |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-03-27 20:36:12 | Re: BUG #16320: GSSAPI Error |