Re: BUG #15587: Partitions with ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #15587: Partitions with ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT
Date: 2019-01-21 16:29:44
Message-ID: 201901211629.gu3plkjjqefw@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 2019-Jan-21, Amit Langote wrote:

> Sorry about the noise. I agree with the committed approach.

Great, thanks for checking.

> With this,
> ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY's inheritance recursion path now looks
> completely different from ALTER TABLE ADD CHECK's, but that's fine.
> Actually, if we had the same "clone" approach for check constraints, which
> both checks if a child already has the constraint being cloned and creates
> one if not, we could do away with errors like the following:
>
> create table p (a int, constraint check_a check (a > 0)) partition by list
> create table p1 (a int);
> alter table p attach partition p1 for values in (1);
> ERROR: child table is missing constraint "check_a"
>
> But of course that would be a different feature.

Heh, I wasn't aware that this failed in this silly way. But yeah,
that's a different feature and we would certainly not backpatch a fix
for it.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-01-21 17:31:02 Re: BUG #15600: ts_stat's nentry maxes out at 255
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2019-01-21 15:30:26 BUG #15600: ts_stat's nentry maxes out at 255