Re: Is temporary functions feature official/supported? Found some issues with it.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alexey Bashtanov <bashtanov(at)imap(dot)cc>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mi Tar <mmitar(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Is temporary functions feature official/supported? Found some issues with it.
Date: 2019-01-18 00:28:32
Message-ID: 20190118002832.GB1883@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:36:33AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Sure, done. I have been working on this patch more this morning, and
> here is a proposal for commit. So please let me know if there are any
> objections with that.

Committed down to v10 which is where MyXactFlags is available.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-01-18 02:37:14 Re: Is temporary functions feature official/supported? Found some issues with it.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-01-17 22:23:06 Re: BUG #15587: Partitions with ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT