| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CF app feature request |
| Date: | 2018-11-04 00:28:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20181104002837.GE1743@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 09:15:36PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> Just to make sure, if a duplicated entry will be removed, the patch itself
> will stay or not? I'm asking, because both entries have the same patch
> referenced, and the admin form says that one of the related items, that
> would be removed is the patch item.
If you remove only one entry, its references will be removed but the
second one will remain. If you want me to proceed, I can do so. I have
done that in the past, and it is not the first time someone registers a
duplicated entry in the CF app.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-11-04 01:00:11 | Re: Resetting PGPROC atomics in ProcessInit() |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-11-04 00:26:49 | Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables |