Re: Postgres 11 release notes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Adrien NAYRAT <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres 11 release notes
Date: 2018-10-10 22:13:56
Message-ID: 20181010221356.GB7807@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 06:06:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:55:33PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Several people argued for introducing it, you're the only one that was
> > against it. Adrien, Amit Kapila, Peter Geoghegan, and I all said we
> > think that kind of thing should be included.
>
> Then you need to start a new thread and argue that we need to include
> more optimizer items in the release notes. My point was that I was
> using the existing criteria, and if we want to change it, we have to do
> it consistently, not just jam in one item.
>
> Once we agree we can go back and see what we missed in PG 11.

Years ago someone said they wanted more optimizer items in the release
notes, so I did it, and then many more people said they didn't want it
--- I don't want to repeat the experience.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-10-10 23:57:20 Re: Postgres 11 release notes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2018-10-10 22:06:01 Re: Postgres 11 release notes

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-10-10 23:57:20 Re: Postgres 11 release notes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2018-10-10 22:06:01 Re: Postgres 11 release notes