Re: Doc bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doc bug
Date: 2006-05-30 05:26:51
Message-ID: 20176.1148966811@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> I'm sure nobody was really confused by this little copy/paste oops in the
> comments but just for the hell of it.

Egad, how old is that? [digs in archives...] That comment is there,
and wrong, in the original Postgres95 version imported into our CVS.
I don't see it though in Postgres V4R2, so the odds are that Jolly
or Chen is to be blamed.

Patch applied ... kudos for spotting it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Doc bug at 2006-05-30 04:30:38 from Greg Stark

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-30 10:19:16 Re: [PATCH] Add support for GnuTLS
Previous Message Greg Stark 2006-05-30 04:30:38 Doc bug