| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling |
| Date: | 2017-09-23 11:14:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20170923111415.uswmkulp37k4bzcd@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> One idea I just had is to somehow add it to src/test/modules/brin, and
> set up the postmaster in that test with autovacuum_naptime=1s. I'll go
> check how feasible that is. (By placing it there we could also verify
> that the index does indeed contain the index entries we expect, since it
> has pageinspect available.)
Yeah, this works, as per the attached patch.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Add-autovacuum-work-items-test-for-BRIN.patch | text/plain | 2.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-09-23 11:16:30 | Re: brin_summarize_new_values error checking |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-09-23 10:30:50 | Re: Rethinking autovacuum.c memory handling |