Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Date: 2017-02-07 21:45:18
Message-ID: 20170207214518.tyyzt75rqppfeefv@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-02-07 16:36:55 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > FWIW, I think it'd have been better to not add the new callbacks as
> > parameters to *_create(), but rather have them be "templatized" like the
> > rest of simplehash. That'd require that callback to check the context,
> > to know whether it should use shared memory or not, but that seems fine
> > to me. Right now this pushes the head of simplehash above a
> > cacheline...
>
> Something like the attached?

Yes.

> +#ifndef SH_USE_NONDEFAULT_ALLOCATOR
> +

That should probably be documented in the file header.

Thanks!

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-02-07 22:14:19 Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Previous Message Michael Banck 2017-02-07 21:39:13 Re: Press Release Draft - 2016-02-09 Cumulative Update