Re: safer node casting

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: safer node casting
Date: 2017-01-27 01:01:22
Message-ID: 20170127010122.4xrehdj5k2qq3qbm@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-01-26 17:27:45 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > #if defined(USE_ASSERT_CHECKING) && defined(PG_USE_INLINE)
> > is probably a better gatekeeper in the back-branches, than gcc?
>
> Ah, yeah, that would work --- I'd already swapped out that business ;-)

Done that way.

- Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-01-27 01:03:56 Re: safer node casting
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2017-01-27 00:16:41 Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal