| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Logical Replication WIP |
| Date: | 2016-12-13 21:05:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20161213210511.4ucn6la2hdsjrcu6@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2016-12-13 15:42:17 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think this is getting very close to the point where it's committable.
> So if anyone else has major concerns about the whole approach and
> perhaps the way the new code in 0005 is organized, now would be the time ...
Uh. The whole cache invalidation thing is completely unresolved, and
that's just the publication patch. I've not looked in detail at later
patches. So no, I don't think so.
I think after the invalidation issue is resolved the publication patch
might be close to being ready. I'm doubtful the later patches are.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-12-13 21:06:58 | Re: Logical Replication WIP |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-12-13 20:42:17 | Re: Logical Replication WIP |