| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logical Replication WIP |
| Date: | 2016-09-12 19:54:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20160912195413.vn3puugutaeungag@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-09-12 21:47:08 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 09/09/16 06:33, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > The start_replication option pg_version option is not documented and
> > not used in any later patch. We can probably do without it and just
> > rely on the protocol version.
> >
>
> That's leftover from binary type data transfer which is not part of this
> initial approach as it adds a lot of complications to both protocol and
> apply side. So yes can do without.
FWIW, I don't think we can leave this out of the initial protocol
design. We don't have to implement it, but it has to be part of the
design.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-12 19:55:34 | Re: inappropriate use of NameGetDatum macro |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2016-09-12 19:47:08 | Re: Logical Replication WIP |