Re: Long options for pg_ctl waiting

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Long options for pg_ctl waiting
Date: 2016-09-07 20:41:57
Message-ID: 20160907204157.GA162322@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gavin Flower wrote:

> possibly '--nosync' (& any similar) should have a '--no-sync' variation
> added, with the '--nosync' variation documented as depreciated?

I agree -- I would go as far as just documenting --no-sync only and
keeping the --nosync one working with minimal (if any) visibility in
docs.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-09-07 20:53:34 Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in joinrels.c
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-09-07 20:31:53 Re: Possible optimization on Function Scan