| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: max_parallel_degree > 0 for 9.6 beta |
| Date: | 2016-08-04 04:29:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20160804042927.GA2429429@tornado.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:28:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > max_parallel_degree currently defaults to 0. I think we should enable
> > it by default for at least the beta period. Otherwise we're primarily
> > going to get reports back after the release.
>
> > Then, at the end of beta, we can decide what the default should be.
>
> +1, but let's put an entry on the 9.6 open-items page to remind us to
> make that decision at the right time.
It's that time. Do we restore the max_parallel_workers_per_gather=0 default,
or is enabling this by default the right thing after all?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2016-08-04 04:40:58 | Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-08-04 04:25:55 | Re: New version numbering practices |