Re: PostmasterContext survives into parallel workers!?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostmasterContext survives into parallel workers!?
Date: 2016-08-01 22:18:29
Message-ID: 20160801221829.kfa7hzqlzt47mwsb@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-08-01 18:09:03 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> (Also vaguely on the list of things to clean up: can't we make it so
> that bgworkers aren't launched from inside a signal handler? Blech.)

Isn't pretty much everything on-demand below postmaster started from a
signal handler?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-08-01 22:19:22 Re: Combining hash values
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-08-01 22:18:27 Re: PostmasterContext survives into parallel workers!?