From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>, "Maeldron T(dot)" <maeldron(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Allowing multiple versions of PG under NetBSD |
Date: | 2016-07-29 20:51:40 |
Message-ID: | 20160729205140.GX4028@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
* Larry Rosenman (ler(at)lerctr(dot)org) wrote:
> On 2016-07-29 15:14, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 03:09:59PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >>>Data Directory naming, as well as keeping the init-scripts straight.
> >>>
> >>And who gets 5432, and Unix socket naming, it starts to get messy.....
> >
> >Well, pg_upgrade uses a socket created in the current run directory, so
> >that should be fine.
> if we're talking JUST for pg_upgrade, that's one thing. Peaceful
> co-existence on an ongoing basis
> is quite another.....
It's not an insurmountable problem, though it's a bit painful. Still,
both the Debian-based and RedHat-based distributions demonstrate how it
can be done.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rakesh Kumar | 2016-07-29 21:16:49 | restore a specific schema from physical backup |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-07-29 20:47:35 | Re: pg_dumping extensions having sequences with 9.6beta3 |