| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: installcheck failing on psql_crosstab |
| Date: | 2016-06-06 14:06:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20160606140610.GA386184@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier wrote:
> I know that we guarantee that make installcheck may not work on many
> target servers as a lot of tests are very GUC-sensitive, but this
> looks a bit oversensitive to me, especially knowing that it is the
> only diff generated by the whole test suite.
> Don't you think that those tests could be made more portable?
Not sure about that. I think the only way to change this would be to
remove those particular tests completely, and I don't think that's a
good tradeoff. If somebody can show a way to avoid the problem without
removing those tests for multiline functionality, I'm all ears.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-06 14:13:24 | Re: installcheck failing on psql_crosstab |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-06 14:06:09 | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |