| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft |
| Date: | 2016-04-27 03:01:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20160427030116.GA3739@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:46:43PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think there's a fine line between advocating good third-party
> projects and undue partisanship. If we advocate a bunch of
> Crunchy-developed tools and no 2ndQuadrant-developed tools, or visca
> versa, then people at the other company may not like that very much.
> Never mind what might be done by EnterpriseDB, Dalibo, PG Experts, and
> others. If we never recommend anything, that's not good, but favoring
> one company over another is not good either. I don't know how to
> strike the right balance there, but I think that's a topic for another
> day.
I agree we need more of a tool focus, e.g. I still can't figure out the
features of the various backup tools. I think it needs a wiki page or a
set of blog entries to really cover the details.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-04-27 03:07:05 | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-27 02:46:43 | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft |