Re: Weighted Stats

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Weighted Stats
Date: 2016-04-08 23:31:52
Message-ID: 20160408233152.GD15407@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:12:12PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:36 AM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > Please find attached a patch that uses the float8 version to cover the
> > numeric types.
>
> Is there a well-defined meaning for having a negative weight? If no,
> should it be disallowed?

Done.

> Shouldn't these then give the same result:
>
> select stddev_samp(val) from foo;
> stddev_samp
> -------------------
> 2887.054977297105
>
> select weighted_stddev_samp(val,count) from foo2;
> weighted_stddev_samp
> ----------------------
> 2887.19919651336
>
> The 5th digit seems too early to be seeing round-off error.

Fixed down-thread.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-04-08 23:57:31 the buildfarm has measles
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-04-08 23:25:53 Re: [patch] Proposal for \crosstabview in psql