Re: So, can we stop supporting Windows native now?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: So, can we stop supporting Windows native now?
Date: 2016-03-31 22:44:30
Message-ID: 20160331224430.GA181264@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> > It would also be nice to find out why we can't usefully scale shared buffers
> > higher like we can on *nix.
>
> Has anyone ever looked into whether asking for SEC_LARGE_PAGES would
> help with that?

The huge_pages feature is fairly new, and as I recall the intention is
that other operating systems will be supported as we get patches for it.
Feel free to submit something.

If you can actually research the performance problem with large
shared_buffers, that would also be welcome.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-03-31 23:15:14 Re: Correction for replication slot creation error message in 9.6
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-03-31 22:21:12 Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers