From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] Client Log Output Filtering |
Date: | 2016-03-29 15:37:19 |
Message-ID: | 20160329153719.GA848699@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Steele wrote:
> On 3/29/16 10:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >Repurposing COMMERROR is definitely starting to seem like a low-impact
> >solution compared to these others. Under what circumstances would you
> >be wanting hide-from-client with an elevel different from LOG, anyway?
>
> In pgaudit the log level for audit messages is user configurable but this
> was mostly added for testing purposes on the client side. I don't think it
> would be a big deal to force the level to LOG when client output is
> suppressed.
So audit records would use COMMERROR? That sounds really bad to me.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Steele | 2016-03-29 15:43:18 | Re: 2016-03 Commitfest |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-03-29 15:34:23 | Re: Some messages of pg_rewind --debug not getting translated |