| From: | Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade 9.4 -> 9.5 with pg_trgm fails for me |
| Date: | 2016-01-08 11:58:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20160108115833.GC22446@hermes.hilbert.loc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:45:29PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> pg_restore: erstelle EXTENSION „pg_trgm“
> pg_restore: erstelle COMMENT „EXTENSION "pg_trgm"“
> pg_restore: erstelle FUNCTION „pg_catalog.gtrgm_in("cstring")“
> pg_restore: [Archivierer (DB)] Fehler in Phase PROCESSING TOC:
> pg_restore: [Archivierer (DB)] Fehler in Inhaltsverzeichniseintrag 893; 1255 511230 FUNCTION gtrgm_in("cstring") postgres
> pg_restore: [Archivierer (DB)] could not execute query: ERROR: pg_type OID value not set when in binary upgrade mode
> Die Anweisung war: CREATE FUNCTION "gtrgm_in"("cstring") RETURNS "gtrgm"
> LANGUAGE "c" IMMUTABLE STRICT
> AS '$libdir/pg_trgm', 'gtrgm_in'...
>
> For one thing - does it seem odd that the function would be
> named "gtrgm_in" rather than "pgtrgm_in" ?
A bit of searching shows that that seems to be normal.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2016-01-08 12:02:03 | Re: pg_upgrade 9.4 -> 9.5 with pg_trgm fails for me |
| Previous Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2016-01-08 11:45:29 | pg_upgrade 9.4 -> 9.5 with pg_trgm fails for me |