Re: Fwd: Cluster "stuck" in "not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss"

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Cluster "stuck" in "not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss"
Date: 2015-12-17 17:14:15
Message-ID: 20151217171415.GB5910@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-12-17 09:04:25 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > But I'm somewhat confused what this has to do with Andres's report.
>
> Doesn't it explain the exact situation he is in, where the oldest
> database is 200 million, but the cluster as a whole is 2 billion?

There were no crashes, so no, I don't think so.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2015-12-17 17:29:14 Re: Should TIDs be typbyval = FLOAT8PASSBYVAL to speed up CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-12-17 17:07:38 Re: Let PostgreSQL's On Schedule checkpoint write buffer smooth spread cycle by tuning IsCheckpointOnSchedule?