From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor Perl test code |
Date: | 2015-12-03 20:28:08 |
Message-ID: | 20151203202808.GR2763@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> BTW, not the fault of this patch in particular, but this example points
> >> up the complaint I've had right along about how opaque TAP test failures
> >> are. How did you dig down to see that error message?
>
> > Well, it showed up on my terminal...
>
> Not on mine, as per the extract I showed. Probably a Perl version
> difference, but I don't think we can exactly write off RHEL6 as an
> uninteresting obsolete distribution. (The Perl here is 5.10.1.)
Hmm, maybe a selinux policy or something like that is preventing some
system call from working, and this causes a Perl call to fail which we
may be failing to report; for instance we have
open(ORIG_STDOUT, ">&STDOUT");
in TestLib.pm's INIT block, without an "or die" which would let us know
that it failed.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-03 21:57:33 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor Perl test code |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-03 19:30:25 | pgsql: Clean up some psql issues around handling of the query output fi |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-12-03 20:45:44 | Re: pg_hba_lookup function to get all matching pg_hba.conf entries |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-12-03 19:49:09 | Re: broken tests |