| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: row_security GUC, BYPASSRLS |
| Date: | 2015-09-20 21:35:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20150920213546.GE3685@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Joe Conway (mail(at)joeconway(dot)com) wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 01:07 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > Great. Robert, does that work for you, too? If so, this sub-thread is
> > looking at three patches:
> >
> > 1. remove row_security=force
> > 2. remove SECURITY_ROW_LEVEL_DISABLED; make ri_triggers.c subject to policies
> > 3. add DDL-controlled, per-table policy forcing
> >
> > They ought to land in that order. PostgreSQL 9.5 would need at least (1) and
> > (2); would RLS experts find it beneficial for me to take care of those?
>
> That would be awesome, but I would say that if we do #1 & 2 for 9.5, we
> also need #3.
Agreed on all of the above.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-09-20 21:57:41 | Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-20 20:12:53 | Re: RemoveLocalLock pfree'ing NULL when out-of-memory |