| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message |
| Date: | 2015-09-10 00:47:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20150910004719.GA19524@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:32:10AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-09-09 18:27:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:37 AM, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > Sure, it’s a clear fact that, we can implement this function
> > > with RAISE statements.
> >
> > Given that, I suggest we just forget the whole thing.
>
> I'm not convinced. Sure, it's easy, but I by now have written the
> respective function dozens of times. Why should we force that on
> everyone?
+20 or so here, that being the number of times I recall offhand having
written the function.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Charles Sheridan | 2015-09-10 00:55:45 | Re: Do Layered Views/Relations Preserve Sort Order ? |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2015-09-10 00:44:59 | Re: Do Layered Views/Relations Preserve Sort Order ? |