Re: GIN pending clean up is not interruptable

On 2015-09-03 12:45:34 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > On 2015-08-12 11:59:48 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> >> Attached patch does it that way. There was also a free-standing
> >> CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() which had no reason that I could see not be a
> >> vacuum_delay_point, so I changed that one as well.
>
> - if (vac_delay)
> - vacuum_delay_point();
> + vacuum_delay_point();
>
> If vac_delay is false, e.g., ginInsertCleanup() is called by the backend,
> vacuum_delay_point() should not be called. No?

No, that's the whole point of the change, we need a
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() even when called by backends. I personally think
it's rather ugly to rely on the the one in vacuum_delay_point, but Jeff
and Tom think it's better, and I can live with that.

Greetings,

Andres Freund