| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What does RIR as in fireRIRrules stand for? |
| Date: | 2015-08-27 13:51:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20150827135107.GH2435@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-08-27 09:43:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > I searched the current code, all diffs to the current code, and the
> > mailing list, but still haven't got an actual clue what RIR is supposed
> > to stand for. There's a few things that come to mind (Rewrite Instead
> > Rule?), but none of them seem to make too much sense.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3E887762.5B68F64B@Yahoo.com
Oops. I saw that message but thought, based on the subject, it'd a scam
mail...
Can we either add a comment to the effect of Jan's message, or just
renamoe the functions/variables?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
PS: The sources taught me something today:
reality is for dead birds -- glass
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-08-27 13:52:45 | Re: What does RIR as in fireRIRrules stand for? |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-08-27 13:47:04 | Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention |