Re: Alpha2/Beta1

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Alpha2/Beta1
Date: 2015-07-22 03:40:58
Message-ID: 20150722034058.GA1365277@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:01:57PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> At the Developer's Meeting, we said we'd be releasing an alpha or beta
> each month until final 9.5 release. As such, we should be releasing a
> 9.5 alpha/beta in the first week of August.
>
> My question for Hackers is: should this be Alpha2 or Beta 1?

I vote for alpha2. Comparing the "Open Issues" and "resolved after 9.5alpha1"
sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, we've
not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability.

Thanks,
nm

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-07-22 03:55:13 Re: [HACKERS] object_classes array is broken, again
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-07-22 02:56:10 Re: ALTER TABLE .. ADD PRIMARY KEY .. USING INDEX has dump-restore hazard