Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for?

From: PT <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allowing postgresql to accept 0xff syntax for data types that it makes sense for?
Date: 2015-05-27 20:34:30
Message-ID: 20150527163430.7993b28fb1e527e8d2646abf@potentialtech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Well, whether good or bad, my employer has nixed the idea of paying me
to work on this, and I don't have personal time right now to do it,
so it's not going to be addressed by me at this time.

--
Bill <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug Gorley 2015-05-27 21:22:14 Constraint exclusion not working - need different constraints?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-05-27 18:35:33 Re: [Postgresql NLS support] : Help on using NLS , Custom dictionary to enhance our website search functionality