| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
| Date: | 2015-05-08 19:09:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20150508190957.GW12950@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-05-08 14:59:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > I think Peter (on IM) just found a more likely explanation than mine.
> > index_close(idxRel, NoLock);
> > heap_close(relation, NoLock);
> > candidates = lappend_oid(candidates, idxForm->indexrelid);
> > ...
> > Yes. idxForm points into idxRel->rd_index.
>
> Ooops. But shouldn't that have failed 100% of the time in a CCA build?
> Or is the candidates list fairly noncritical?
Afaics RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE is independent of CCA (should we change
that?). So this probably a bug, just not a relevant bug. I can't see
how it'd take affect in this case.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-08 19:13:04 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-05-08 19:09:47 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-08 19:13:04 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-05-08 19:09:47 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |