Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app
Date: 2015-04-13 13:33:35
Message-ID: 20150413133335.GN4369@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David G. Johnston wrote:

> Can we create a "fake" CF time period into which all of these "waiting on
> author" entries can be placed and readily browsed/found instead of leaving
> them in whatever CF they happened to stall in?

This seems a good idea to me -- not a "fake CF", but a page listing all
the Returned With Feedback patches, regardless of which commitfest(s)
they're linked onto.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2015-04-13 13:44:53 Re: FPW compression leaks information
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-04-13 13:11:00 Re: pg_rewind in contrib