Re: Assertion failure when streaming logical changes

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assertion failure when streaming logical changes
Date: 2015-04-07 12:54:20
Message-ID: 20150407125420.GA12291@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-04-07 17:22:12 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> It might be a good idea to apply this if nothing better is forthcoming.
> Logical decoding in WALsenders is broken at the moment.

Yes.

> Otherwise it needs to go on the 9.5 blockers list.
>
> But could we get rid of those active_count manipulations too? Could you
> > replace the SnapBuildSnap[Inc|Dec]Refcount calls with
> > [Un]RegisterSnapshot()?
> >
>
> It would be interesting to know why it was done that way in the first
> place, rather than using the snapshot management infrastructure.

Because the snapshot tracking infrastructure isn't particularly
suitable. These snapshots are much longer lived; they span transactions
and such. Nothing snapmgr.c is made for. It seemed more
complicated/bug-prone to change snapmgr.c to support a foreign use case.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-04-07 13:08:03 Re: PATCH: Add 'pid' column to pg_replication_slots
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2015-04-07 12:11:49 Row security violation error is misleading