From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Error with index on unlogged table |
Date: | 2015-03-25 13:53:43 |
Message-ID: | 20150325135343.GB14165@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2015-03-25 11:38:30 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> > The index is unlogged until reindexing...
> >
> > [...]
> > Which is think also raises the question, why are unlogged indexes made
> > persistent by a reindex?
>
> That's a bug of HEAD, ~9.4 keeping the index as unlogged even after
> REINDEX INDEX. What happens is that ReindexIndex relies on
> relpersistence provided by makeRangeVar at parse time, which is just
> incorrect as it uses RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT all the time. The patch
> attached fixes that...
What the hell? That's somewhat nasty. Nice that it got caught before 9.5
was released.
Did you check whether a similar bug was made in other places of
85b506bb? Could you additionally add a regression test to this end?
Seems like something worth testing.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-03-25 13:55:14 | varlena.c hash_any() and hash_uint32() calls require DatumGetUInt32() |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2015-03-25 13:45:41 | Re: Error with index on unlogged table |